When the first Tea Parties were thrown earlier in the year, there wasn't much coverage of it nor was there really a strong response, no matter what the backers said. Then came the ratcheting up of the rhetoric because of the health care "debate" and the town hall meetings. This time, the Tea Party on The Mall in Washington, D.C. drew a decent sized crowd.
I supported the initial Tea Parties because I thought it was a real ground roots response to the prior spending binge done by Republicans and Democrats during the Bush administration years. To me, people were FINALLY fed up at the spending madness and the TARP bailout.
When people started protesting against the "health care reform" being discussed, I supported the criticism of the general ideas and when I read sections of one of the bills, I saw things that I didn't like but I also DID NOT SEE things some critics said about "the bill." But that's a part of normal politics. What caused me to step back and go, "Wha?", was some of the behavior at the "town hall" meetings and some people showing up in the vicinity of the meetings with guns.
Come on. Let's be real. What does gun ownership have to do with what is being "discussed" at the time?
And then came the criticism of Obama's speech to children when the same people complaining didn't complain when such speeches happened before, curriculum or no curriculum.
As I've written before, some of the Obama administration policies I don't like. I think they are wrong and will do more long term harm than good. But the rhetoric is way over the top and I'm giving some of the critics the side-eye.
Is the criticism the result of "the final big government straw" breaking the back of taxpayers or is it more likely something else. Frankly, I'm no longer outright dismissing the "fear of a Black POTUS" cries.
Yeah, that's the side eye.
Recent Comments