My Internet connection has been down. Here is a backlog of things that I wanted to address but was unable to do so.
Personhood
LOS ANGELES -- A proposal to define a fertilized human egg as a person will land on Colorado's ballot this November, marking the first time that the question of when life begins will go before voters anywhere in the nation.
The Human Life Amendment, also known as the personhood amendment, says the words "person" or "persons" in the state constitution should "include any human being from the moment of fertilization." If voters agreed, legal experts say, it would give fertilized eggs the same legal rights and protections to which people are entitled.
Let me say something about this. While the pro-life people are backing this and the pro-abortion people are up in arms, those who should be concerned the most are people who use different fertility treatment methods to conceive. When eggs are harvested and fertilized in a dish, some are implanted while some are frozen. What happens to the embryos frozen but not implanted? If they are destroyed, then what? Will criminal charges be filed then? And if so, what does THAT mean to fertility treatment methods in general?
Off Colored (HAH!) Joke
"Being a president is tough 'cause you're not just running the country. You got to run your family too," Mac said. "Having a black first lady is different. You're still going to have to do the dishes and the laundry and all that … 'You got to pick up the kids. You didn't pick up the kids?'"
Bernie Mac tells an off colored joke and people get upset? Haven't they SEEN a Bernie Mac comedy routine?
Colbert I. King -- Funny Quip
The same might be said about the so-called African American perspective on other such disparate issues as faith-based initiatives, Obama's word choices, wife Michelle Obama, hip-hop, shoe and hair styles, what's beautiful, what's ugly, abortion, gun control, watermelon, California wildfires, chitlins, pit bulls, personal responsibility, societal responsibility, the Baptist Church, the Catholic Church, Jeremiah Wright, the Nation of Islam, missile defense, the estate tax and half-smokes.
Chitlins? Half-smokes? WATERMELON????? *ROTFL*
Skip Gates, I Could Have Told Your Behind This!
I worry even more that Watson confessed to me that "we shouldn't expect
that [ethnically] different persons have equal intelligence, because we
don't know that. And people say that these should be the same [that is,
all ethnic groups] . . . I think the answer is we don't know." Later,
he remarked that "we're not all the same," by which he meant
genetically, across ethnic groups. Soon, some scientist somewhere will
claim to have proved this, and that claim could be deeply problematic
for the future of black people in this society, even if my rights to
equal treatment under the law are not predicated upon the hypothesis
that all human groups have the same genetic endowments. Watson's
tendency to theorize about groups -- a very human tendency --
undermines his declared belief that humans should be judged as
individuals.
Afterward, I realized what fear my conversation with Watson had
confirmed: that the idea of innate group inferiority is still on the
table, despite all the progress blacks have made in this society, and
that the last great battle over racism will not be fought over access
to a lunch counter, or the right to vote, or even the right to occupy
the White House;
it will be fought in a laboratory, under a microscope, on the
battleground of our DNA. That is where we, as a society, will resolve
the contentious claim that groups are, by nature, differently
advantaged in the most important way: over the degree of reason or
intelligence that they ostensibly possess.
People in my family faced this directly, and after the Civil Rights Act, and time to allow government to punish people and companies, it is "amazing" the progress many people in my family made. I don't understand why Henry Lewis Gates didn't understand this from the start.
Recent Comments