I am not a wordsmith, so when I use certain words, I do so with deliberation. For example, I don't use "racist" much because I think there is great confusion in the use of "racist" and "racism" when "bigot" or "bigotry" should be used. And, of course, disparate impact isn't racism.
Having said that, I looked up the word corrupt for a reason:
transitive senses
1 a : to change from good to bad in morals, manners, or actions; also : BRIBE b : to degrade with unsound principles or moral values
intransitive senses
1 a : to become tainted or rotten b : to become morally debased
2 : to cause disintegration or ruin
Yes, that's the word whose meaning I am going to use.
I also looked up the definition of another word: activist.
Function: noun
: a doctrine or practice that emphasizes direct vigorous action
especially in support of or opposition to one side of a controversial
issue
- ac·tiv·ist /-vist/ noun or adjective
When I look at the words, it's easy to say that an activist, by definition, will become corrupt because of the vigorous support of opposition to something.
My positive nature, which I do have, likes to believe that most activists don't become corrupt, but the realist in me (not cynic), knows that many will cross that line. For examples, see Jesse Jackson, Sr's work against liquor stores in depressed neighborhoods until his sons received an beer distributorship or Al Sharpton's work against predatory lending until he started being a pitch man for car title loans.
Let's say a person becomes an activist to point out what they believe is hypocrisy in the reporting of news that involves racial matters.
Let's say a person sees news of the day that goes one way, but their activist stance dictates that they point out something going the other way. Let's say that person does it, but ignores other instances that rebuts their stance. Let's also say that person ignores strong evidence of reporting in the current time frame, that rebuts their stance.
But, this person still says one reporting of instances overwhelms the other reporting of instances, instances which that person is now actively trying to bring to light.
By ignoring the obvious, has that person now crossed the line to become corrupt?
Like I say, I'm not a wordsmith.
Maybe corrupt activist is an oxymoron.
Recent Comments