Mike nailed how I tend to view political discussions.
The blogosphere is about aggregation, not about change. It's about
fleshing out ideas, but people still go where they go. And very few
people wander out of their own comfort zones. The blogosphere is
passive. Transformative politics needs to be active. The surprise of
Vision Circle comes from Ed Brown, the last pundit standing. As a
late-comer to the game, he was constantly reminding all sides that we
were taking our arguments a bit to far - that mischaracterization of
left and right dominated discussions, truces were more likely than
synergies and blackfolks persist anyway.
I want to give some examples that supports his comments, even though I don't believe they really need support. His comments stand well on their own.
Let's examine the issue of politicians going to Black churches, every four years, for voter support. Over a period of time, I noticed that politicians appeared in the same churches or the with the same pastors. I started wondering exactly how many churches the politicians appeared. By my estimate, politicians in the Baltimore and D.C. area appear in, probably, less than 1% of Black churches in urban areas.
To add to this, certain people, of certain political stripes, attempt to make a case for the "failure of the Black church". Typically, they will point to the out of wedlock birth rate as the prime example to make their case. Ignoring glaring intellectual problems with the supposition, let's assume those people are correct. If they are correct, then the failure of the Black church would mean that its ability to influence the behavior of Blacks is minimal. If that's the case, how can the Black church be so influential in Black politics?
Democrats want to believe the idea of the Black church being central to Black politics because it continues to allow Democrats to present nothing but a side show when addressing Black voters. Republicans want to continue to present this idea because it allows them to marginalize the Black voter and their collective "intelligence" and, now, because it allows them to mimic Democrats in presenting fluff to the Black voter.
"See, your leaders like us. Play along and follow the leader."
Or is that too cynical?
Look at the issue of welfare reform. Democrats went to Black voters saying "Republicans are racist! Look at their attempt at so-called welfare reform!" Meanwhile, Republicans went to white voters saying, "Handouts are not the way to go. It just made Blacks look to government for more handouts. Enough!"
The "trouble" was, the percentage of Blacks on welfare was already falling before welfare reform and the talk of welfare reform. Next, if you examine the most successful implementation of welfare reform by the states, you will notice that Wisconsin implemented many of the "liberal" ideas about getting people off of welfare: continuing education, job training, and providing subsidized day care. And, to put the cherry on top, the implementation cost was more than the pre-welfare reform cost. Yet, it was said that welfare reform would most likely save money.
Let's take a quick look at affirmative action. Republican opposition came down to "unqualified Blacks getting jobs or into college at the expensive of more qualified white people." Tepid Democrat support came down to "racism causing Blacks not to even be considered." I believe in affirmative action. I find it interesting that when a study came out concerning people applying for a job, one set with "Black sounding names" and another set with "normal names," that despite the qualifications and quality of the resume, the resumes with the "Black sounding names" were more likely to be rejected.
Then, when we get to education, we come across nuggets like this one:
Nearing a diploma, most college students cannot handle many complex but common tasks, from understanding credit card offers to comparing the cost per ounce of food.
Those are the sobering findings of a study of literacy on college campuses, the first to target the skills of students as they approach the start of their careers.
More than 50 percent of students at four-year schools and more than 75 percent at two-year colleges lacked the skills to perform complex literacy tasks.
From memory, 12% of Blacks have college degrees while, for whites, 28% have college degrees. Clearly, most people don't have a college degree, so the "debate" about college entrance is over crumbs. Again, from memory, Glenn Lourey mentioned in an Emerge Magazine article that most Black students, around 85%, apply to schools for which their SAT scores are within 10% of the median SAT score.
But politics doesn't lead to rational discussion. Instead you get lame sound bite analysis and pushing of the hot buttons of emotion.
When you bring Blacks into the mix, you get the ugly mess of the current state of Black politics: Black Democrats calling Republicans names, Black Republicans playing the victim card and doing name calling of their own. Black Democrats giving the impression that Blacks are helpless and Black Republicans giving the impression that Blacks are helpless only because of white liberals.
Recent Comments