For years there has been, for lack of a better word, debate within the Black community concerning "what it means to be Black" or if a person is "Black enough." That concept, "Black enough," has been rightly criticized by some within the Black community. But why is the idea of whites thinking a Black person is "too Black" not something that should be criticized?
This opinion article, "Color Test Where Whites Draw The Line", I think, puts it all out there. I've heard this said and written about before, and on conservative talk radio, I've heard the comment defended. I think it's a comment that can't be honestly defended.
How black is too black?
Millions of African-Americans celebrated Barack Obama’s historic victory, seeing in it a reflection — sudden and shocking — of their own expanded horizons. But whether Mr. Obama captures the White House in November will depend on how he is seen by white Americans. Indeed, some people argue that one of the reasons Mr. Obama was able to defeat Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton was that a large number of white voters saw him as “postracial.”
In other words, Mr. Obama was black, but not too black.
But where is the line? Does it change over time? And if it is definable, then how black can Mr. Obama be before he alienates white voters? Or, to pose the question more cynically, how black do the Republicans have to make him to win?
If the last quoted paragraph, the paragraph emphasized, does not make it plain, I don't know what does. This is also something I pointed out here when Michael Steele said, if he faced Mfume in the general election, he would use Mfume's association with the NAACP to say to white voters Steele speaks for all people not some people.
Check this out:
Mr. Buchanan said Mr. Obama’s monolithic support among blacks was likely to stoke such white animosity.
“There’s a sense among some folks that if African-Americans are voting 90 percent for ‘one of us;’ then you’re going to vote for ‘one of us,’ ” he said. When Norm Kagan, a white 62-year-old supporter of Mrs. Clinton’s, was asked in St. Paul, Minn., if white voters in the state would support a black man, he immediately raised the specter of crime, as if the mere mention of blacks brought it to mind. “We’ve all had our problems,” he said. “Every now and then someone gets mugged or robbed. The most economically challenged — which are mostly black — are most often the criminals and not to be trusted.”
Isn't it interesting that conservatives, who claim to be for the individual and say they judge the individual on individual merits, regularly bring up certain group statistics about Blacks to castigate the entire race? Do those same people mention that most Blacks are not involved in crime?
Individuality?
There is a documentary about 2 people who farm 1 acre of corn and follow the corn path through the markets that is eye opening. Everything stated here and more.
I've stopped drinking soda because of the movie. That movie did it. I don't each much beef anyway. But all of the food allergies people are developing is really starting to become an issue to look at for me.
Dirty Jobs - Dirty Jobs is one of the best shows on television. Cable television really is challenging, and many times surpassing, traditional broadcast shows. Mike Rowe is off but has to be one of the best overall in shape persons on television.
Politics and the Presidential Race - I'm going to do a series of posts about political things/ideas/theories that interest me and how they will affect how I vote and who I vote against, more so than who I vote for. I'll end it by stating who will not get my vote and who will, by default, get my vote. I think it's going to be interesting.