My Photo

May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

« J.C. Watts and the Conservative Black Forum | Main | Wait, I Thought Black People Don't Care About Education »

February 14, 2012

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341ca09953ef016301640f78970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why I Don't Use "Reverend" When Mentioning Al Sharpton:

Comments

Dang!

You may not acknowledge the distinction between being pro-choice and supporting abortions, as is your prerogative. However, there is no justification for your disrespect. You can disagree with a person's politics and still recognize that which they've earned.

Duane, Burns went up in there, didn't he?

MIB, I can't honor the title given to him because he willfully goes against the Bible in which he professes. This isn't politics, this is morals.

Nice try, Ed, but no sale.

I meant to address the Bible and same-sex marriage instead of abortion. Like abortion, the Bible makes no mention of same-sex marriage beyond its description of homosexuality as an abomination. But it does address a Christian's relationship between secular authority and God. In Matthew 22:21, Jesus said, "Render unto Caesar...", which meant you're obligated to abide by civil laws and God's word simultaneously. This view is reinforced in Romans 13:1 when Jesus said, "Let everyone be in subjugation to the governing authority". These two quotes have traditionally been interpreted as God and government each having mutually exclusive authority over different realms.

The notion that your objection is moral rather than political doesn't fly either, as you've cited a politician (?!?) discussing someone's position on public policy as the basis for your objection. Not only is Del. Burns 'argument' undermined by his use of an ad hominem against Rev. Sharpton, it's kind of obvious he's not fully up to speed on his preferred religious text.

If I only had a nickel for each one of these jackleg preacher-pols...

You have a strict and impossible criterion for others to follow, or adhere to, in order to receive the title of Reverend.

And that's okay: it's your prerogative.

But know, too, that very few in the Christian clergy or the laity, can, in good conscience, call themselves Christians, or followers of the Christ.

17 And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues;
18 They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover.

Disciples, possibly, but full-fledged Christians, emulators of the Christ, hardly.

The comments to this entry are closed.